Tony Bennett’s charter-school grade manipulation

Former Indiana Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Bennett was some kind of magician. He made dozens of Indianapolis high-school students disappear in order to award an A grade to a charter school founded by a GOP mega-donor.

Tom LoBianco of the Associated Press revealed Monday that Bennett and his Department of Education staff manipulated Indiana’s school grading system to produce an A for Christel House Academy, run by Indianapolis philanthropist Christel DeHaan.

The AP story, relying on email messages obtained under the state’s public-records law, shows Bennett and his top assistants scrambling frantically after they realized highly regarded Christel House was going to get a C under the newly revised grading system.

“I cannot count the number of times we have been in meetings with Christel, The Chamber (of Commerce), Brian Bosma, David Long, and others when I have said that we count Christel House as an A school,” Bennett vented to his assistants in an email on Sept. 13, 2012.

Bosma is speaker of the Indiana House of Representatives. Long is president pro tem of the Indiana Senate. Why do they care what grade a charter school gets? As LoBianco writes, DeHaan “has given more than $2.8 million to Republicans since 1998, including $130,000 to Bennett and thousands more to state legislative leaders.”

Christel House was known as an effective school serving elementary and middle-school students from high-poverty backgrounds. It expanded to ninth grade in 2010 and added 10th-graders in 2011. And in the spring of 2012, its high-school students bombed the state’s end-of-course assessment in algebra.

“Bottom line: Their terrible 10th grade Algebra I results (33 percent passing) was the principal factor in earning a C,” DOE chief assessment officer Jon Gubera wrote in one of the emails.

But a C clearly wasn’t acceptable. So the department found a fix.

Indiana uses two systems to calculate school grades, one for elementary and middle schools and another for high schools. State guidance for “combined schools,” which include both elementary-middle and high-school students, calls for calculating two separate scores and pro-rating them by enrollment to arrive at a school grade.

But Will Krebs, Bennett’s director of policy and research, suggested a different way. He said the state could insist any high-school grade be based on all four factors that go into high-school evaluations: English/language arts test scores, algebra scores, graduation rates and “college and career readiness” (a count of students who take advanced classes or earn college credit).

“This is a loophole,” Krebs wrote in a note to his proposal. Because Christel House had only ninth and 10th graders, it couldn’t be evaluated for graduation rate or college and career readiness. So it wouldn’t get a high-school grade. So its grade wouldn’t reflect the poor algebra results. Test scores from the school’s high-school-age students wouldn’t count against it. For accountability purposes, they would be invisible.

That was enough to raise the grade to a B. How the state got it all the way to an A isn’t immediately clear. Maybe we’ll get a better idea if AP posts more of the emails.

Christel House was one of 13 Indiana schools affected by the new approach, according to the emails. All of them were charter schools.

Bennett told the AP he didn’t do any favors for DeHaan and his only concern was to make sure the system was fair for combined schools. But the emails belie that claim. They show Bennett worried about results for Christel House and Christel House alone.

I heard in early 2012 that DeHaan was upset about the grading system, and I imagined she could make herself heard. But I never guessed Bennett and his staff would be so cynical as to manipulate the grades to bump Christel House all the way from a C to an A.

As LoBianco writes, Indiana’s school grades help determine which schools get taken over by the state and which students get vouchers to leave for private schools, and they also influence state funding. In Georgia, former school officials are facing criminal charges for changing student’s answers on standardized tests. This doesn’t seem a lot different.

About these ads

13 thoughts on “Tony Bennett’s charter-school grade manipulation

  1. One minor correction to the AP report: DeHaan has actually given about $80,000 to Democrats since 1998, not quite 3 percent of her total contributions. So make that “has donated more than $2.7 million to Republicans …”

  2. This action by Tony & his assistants really show what the reform movement is all about- money & power. It was never, ever about kids. Shameful.

  3. Too bad Dr. Bennett and his cabal didn’t have to sign he teacher pledge against cheating. Not that it would have stopped them, it’s just that pledge was designed to humiliate and if everan action calls for humiliation this bit of corruption does.

  4. How they raised the B to an A in the Elem/MS grades is that they removed the “ceiling” from the calculation.

    The math score received 3.5 pts, plus one additional for growth to give Math a 4.5.
    Ela received 3 pts. 4.5 + 3 = 7.5 and 7.5/2 = 3.75, or a letter grade of A.

    HOWEVER, the State Board did not want any one subject to “boost” the overall score if the other subject was less than stellar and imposed a “ceiling”. No subject was to receive a score higher than 4.

    Thus had the ceiling been imposed, the 4.5 would have been dropped to only a 4 for math which would have made 4+3=7 and then 7/2=3.5 for a letter grade of B.

    • Thanks so much, datalady. That works, doesn’t it? How do you know this? Is there a paper trail or a public record somewhere? I couldn’t find references to this in the AP-reported emails that I saw.

      • I found the numbers on IDOE under School Data. Search for their school then click on Accountability.

        The rules for how the numbers are applied have been posted multiple places (,http://doe.in.gov/sites/default/files/accountability/fpresentationdecember.pdf) but I’m not sure if the ceiling is actually in writing. I know the Board made a big deal about the ceiling in one of their meetings (I watched the board meeting and assume a recording exists somewhere).

        I saw that the ceiling was removed last fall when the results came out and always wondered what happened to it. I figured it would take another Board decision, but I’m not sure if one was ever made.

  5. If the school district where Dr. Bennett was the Superintendent was put under this same A-F model during his years there, what would they have rated? Could he have lost his job for his scores?? I bet so…

  6. I found the initial workbook from IDOE that schools could use to approximate their grades. Under the definitions tab it identifies that “The total points in any one subject cannot exceed 4.00 points or be lower than 0.00 points. The current version posted had removed the “cannot exceed 4.00 points” part. The current version can be found: http://doe.in.gov/sites/default/files/accountability/copy-f-approximate-grade-calculation-workbook92412_0.xlsx But I would be happy to e-mail you the original version.

    Bu

  7. My main question is why anyone is surprised that Bennett would do this.

    Ideology+ego+money= inevitable overreach.

  8. Pingback: Detail still missing from Indiana grade-change story | School Matters

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s