Proposed rule would retain third-graders if they fail state reading test?

Last year the Indiana legislature considered a proposal to retain students in third grade if they failed the reading section of the ISTEP-Plus exam. But lawmakers decided not to approve the proposal, citing cost concerns.

Now the State Board of Education is about to adopt the same requirement as an administrative rule. If there are costs, the Department of Education says, they will fall on local schools, which will just have to reallocate funds in order to pay them.

The state board will conduct a public hearing on the rule at 10 a.m. Thursday (Jan. 20) at the Indiana State Library in Indianapolis. It could then adopt the rule at any future meeting. The proposed rule can be read online, as can a DOE summary and FAQ.

In addition to retention, the rule requires schools to implement reading plans that spell out goals for student achievement and interventions for students who aren’t on track. Schools will have to provide 90-minute daily uninterrupted blocks of reading instruction in the primary grades, and most will have to use a research-based core reading program certified by the state.

There are logistical issues to implementing these plans, but it’s the hammer of mandatory retention – arguably punishing kids for failing a single test – that causes concern for some educators.

“I totally agree with the goals, and that we need to have students reading by third grade,” said Cameron Rains, director of elementary instruction for the Monroe County Community School Corp. “But looking at retention and what that does, I don’t know why that is the solution you want for students.”

When the legislature didn’t approve the third-grade retention proposal last year, it instead directed the board of education and the superintendent of public instruction to develop a plan to improve students’ reading skills by third grade. It said retention could be part of the plan “as a last resort.”

But is the proposal really looking to retention as a last resort?

It does call on schools to pursue other strategies – including an extended school day and year, tutoring after school and on Saturdays, guided help from parents, and summer school – before holding kids back. It also suggests that retention doesn’t have to mean repeating the entire third grade. Schools may choose to retain students in reading but let them move on to fourth grade in other subjects.

But other than that, there’s no wiggle room. Students who don’t pass the ISTEP reading test (which hasn’t yet been developed) must be retained. The only exceptions are for students who are in special education, have already been retained two or more times, or are non-English speakers.

Like many current state education reforms, the retention proposal follows the lead of Florida and former Gov. Jeb Bush. In 2003, that state started requiring retention of third-graders who didn’t pass the Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test.

Not surprisingly, Florida fourth-graders’ reading scores improved. But some studies have suggested that gains for retained students don’t last. Indeed, scores for Florida eighth-graders have been flat on reading tests for the National Assessment of Educational Progress. (Indiana eighth-grade NAEP reading scores have been flat too, but they are higher than Florida’s).

More worrisome are studies that suggest grade retention can cause psychological trauma and that the likelihood of dropping out increases dramatically for students who are held back.

School Matters raised some of these concerns with Lauren Auld, spokeswoman for the Department of Education, who sent back a response from the department’s reading experts. They said, in effect, that improving reading is important enough to justify the risk.

“Our goals are to both aggressively promote reading comprehension and improve graduation rates in our schools,” the officials said. “Anything less, such as maintaining the status quo, is unfair to the parents and students to whom we should all defer.”

4 thoughts on “Proposed rule would retain third-graders if they fail state reading test?

  1. This proposed policy is giving more credit to the test score than it can possibily merit. To make such a life changing decision on a number that is so variable is simply wrong. There is no perfect test and to suggest that this new test will be error free is simply uninformed about testing and the limits of what can be inferred.

    This is a terrible policy and should not be approved.

    • I agree, I feel as if they are making life changing decisions based off one test. My sisters and I all grew up “slow” at reading or comprehension, now we are all A students in college. I just don’t understand how they could change someone’s life based off one test. Yes, if they fail make them take summer school, but repeating a whole new year of school where they are going to be doing the same thing over again (math, science, etc.) not just reading seems silly in my opinion. I don’t agree with the pressure they are putting on young children as well. My youngest sister is in third grade this year, just like the rest of us, comprehension, she has been crying all of the time just because of this stupid test that could change her life. But per her teacher she is perfect at everything else beside comprehension….. now does that sound like if she doesn’t pass the reading test she should repeat the whole year? Didn’t think so.

  2. Pingback: State board about to decide on third-grade retention rule « School Matters

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s