Tax caps cost schools hundreds of millions

It seemed like such a good idea at the time. Indiana legislators enacted property tax caps over a decade ago. Then, in 2010, we added them to the state constitution by a referendum vote of 72% to 28%. I don’t recall much talk at the time about consequences for school funding, but we’re seeing them now.

In some school districts, the consequences look to be devastating.

According to data from the Indiana Department of Local Government Finance, public schools are losing about $268 million in revenue this year as a result of caps. That’s over one-tenth of their total levy, the amount of property tax revenue the districts would otherwise be able to raise.

The impact of the caps varies widely, with big losses for some large and urban school districts: $18.3 million for Indianapolis Public Schools, $17.7 million for Gary Community Schools and $12.3 million for Wayne Township (Indianapolis) schools.

Chart showing schools with biggest tax cap losses.

School districts with the largest losses from property tax caps. Source: Indiana Department of Local Government Finance.

Gary schools are losing almost half of their potential local property tax levy.

When it comes to lost revenue per pupil, the biggest losers include Gary Community Schools, $3,535; Muncie Community Schools, $,1,620; Beech Grove School Corp., $1,450; Anderson Community Schools, $1,298; and Westfield-Washington School Corp., $1,134.

It’s probably no accident that Gary and Muncie are the two Indiana districts to be labeled financially “distressed” and taken over by the state. Muncie was later transferred to Ball State University.

Chart of school districts with largest property tax cap losses per pupil.

School districts that lose the most money per pupil from property tax caps. Source: Indiana Department of Local Government Finance.

Terry Spradlin, executive director of the Indiana School Boards Association, noted that the state’s 290 school corporations have lost nearly $1 billion to tax caps in the past four years. The legislature has provided districts some flexibility for managing the losses, but it’s still a struggle.

“These are significant issues that are long-term, and there are no easy solutions,” Spradlin said.

Under Indiana’s school funding system, the state pays most school operating costs, including salaries and benefits for teachers and other school employees. But school corporations rely on local property taxes to pay for transportation, capital projects and construction debt.

Indiana’s property tax caps, sometimes called circuit breaker credits, provide different levels of tax breaks for different categories of property. Taxes for owner-occupied homes are capped at 1% of the property’s total assessed value, while caps are 2% for farm and rental property and 3% for business property.

To keep property owner’s tax bills from exceeding the caps, funding is reduced for local units of government, including school corporations – hence the lost funding.

Property tax rate increases that result from local voter referendums are exempt from the caps.

Why do some districts lose much more than others? A big factor, said Larry DeBoer, a tax and government finance expert at Purdue University, is the extent to which school districts overlap with city and town boundaries.

Overall tax rates tend to be higher in areas where the taxing units include cities or towns, as well as county government, townships, libraries and others. That means property tax calculations in those areas are more likely to exceed the caps. When they are reduced, schools get less money.

“Statewide, more than 90% of all tax-cap losses are in areas that overlap (with cities and towns),” DeBoer said. “It’s an urban problem, not rural problem.”

In a paper published in 2015, DeBoer offered the example of two school districts near Muncie, Yorktown and Delaware. The districts are almost identical, except that the Yorktown district includes the town of Yorktown. As a result, Yorktown lost 14.9% of its tax levy to the caps while Delaware lost 3.8%.

Other circumstances that can make school districts vulnerable to tax caps include:

  • Declining overall property values, which can cause tax rates to rise above the caps.
  • A high share of rental property. Rental property doesn’t qualify for state homeowner tax breaks, resulting in higher tax bills that may exceed the caps.
  • High levels of property tax-financed debt, which can result from growing school districts borrowing to build facilities.

Here is a link to an Excel file showing the total dollars lost to property-tax caps for all Indiana school corporations. The figures, for 2019, are from by the Department of Local Government Finance.

3 thoughts on “Tax caps cost schools hundreds of millions

  1. I would love to see a 9 year cumulative total of funds lost to each school district.
    The state legislature and Governor were SUPPOSED to replace lost property tax revenues with STATE funds for schools. They haven’t kept that promise. K-12 school appropriations have comprised 51% of the state budget since Gov. Otis Bowen’s property tax freeze of 1973. That school portion of the state budget did not increase as promised after property tax caps passed, AND that 51% of the state budget is now divided between public schools, charters, and voucher-recipient private schools – a double whammy to the public schools which now comprise only 48% of the state budget according to Purdue economist DeBoer.
    Yet another funding blow is suffered whenever a school loses a student, thus reducing their per-student funding based on enrollment. So schools have increased class-sizes, cut course offerings, cut student services like school nurses and librarians, and passed on ever-larger health insurance premiums to school staff to fund from their own pockets. It’s no wonder teachers are leaving in droves for less stress, less work, and higher salaries elsewhere.
    The state has passed corporate tax breaks time and again, but the corporate gains have not trickled down to average Hoosiers – half of whom are now in low-wage
    jobs. So it’s not surprising that nearly half of Hoosier students qualify for free or reduced lunches. Too many have no food at home on weekends and holiday breaks. We can’t grow a strong state economic future if malnourished children can’t grow strong minds and bodies.
    Decades ago Russian Premier Kruschev said the USA would destroy itself from within. Why would Indiana choose to prove him right?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s